law of excluded middle
law of excluded middle
Exclusionary rule ("A or not A" is true)
Here are some examples of logic where the law of exclusion does not hold.
__BELOW_IS_AI_GENERATED__
排中律 2023-09-05 01:22 omni.icon
Summary of notes.
The following are examples of logic in which the law of exhaustion (the law that "A or not A" is true) does not hold true. Intuitionistic logic is an example.
Relation to Fragment.
Fragment 1039 has the same content as the note. It describes the Exclusionary Rule and its exceptions.
deep thinking
The law of exclusion is a fundamental principle of logic, but it does not hold true for some logical systems, such as intuitionistic logic. This indicates that logical systems and frameworks of thought are not absolute and can change depending on circumstances and perspectives.
summary of thoughts and title.
The Limitations of the Law of Exclusion and the Varieties of Logic": The law of exclusion is a fundamental principle of logic, but it does not always hold true. The system of logic and the framework of thought may change depending on circumstances and viewpoints.
extra info
TITLES: ["Still no picture blind spot cards"], "The process of thinking about what "thinking" means", "Stages of resolution", "If there are differences in cognitive abilities, the observed facts will also differ", "The unclear dichotomy", "Nested concepts", "The A or not A argument", "Even random is not necessarily a uniform distribution", "Emotion and is", "The flow of knowledge is one-way", "Programming manners"]
generated: 2023-09-05 01:22
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/排中律 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.